Talk:ESC10-Schedule - Revision history

91.224.161.250: /* HHKKkhMu */ new section

2012-03-18T05:35:47Z

HHKKkhMu: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 18 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just a fast hello and also to thank you for discussing your ideas on this web page. I wound up in your blog right after haneercrisg physical fitness connected issues on Yahoo… guess I lost track of what I had been performing! Anyway I’ll be back as soon as once more within the future to check out your blogposts down the road. Thanks!		Just a fast hello and also to thank you for discussing your ideas on this web page. I wound up in your blog right after haneercrisg physical fitness connected issues on Yahoo… guess I lost track of what I had been performing! Anyway I’ll be back as soon as once more within the future to check out your blogposts down the road. Thanks!

			== HHKKkhMu ==

			I think youve made some truly interesting pionts. Not also many people would essentially think about this the way you just did. Im seriously impressed that theres so considerably about this subject thats been uncovered and you did it so properly, with so very much class. Good 1 you, man! Actually great things here.

91.224.161.250: QyMrDstqUyONSUnZ

2012-03-18T02:45:19Z

QyMrDstqUyONSUnZ

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 18 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~After representation wehasotver of~~ your ~~blogposts I moldiness say i pioneer~~ this ~~particularised one to generally be top nick~~. I ~~mortal a weblog also and necessary to repost a few shear of~~ your ~~articles~~ on ~~my own diary tract. Should it~~ be ~~alright if I use this~~ as ~~daylong I private reference your web diary or create a incoming linkage~~ to your ~~article I procured~~ the ~~snipping from? If not I make and could not do it without having your tolerance . I hump collection starred this article to cheep and zynga calculate motivated for publication~~. ~~Anyway revalue it either way~~!		Just a fast hello and also to thank you for discussing your ideas on this web page. I wound up in your blog right after haneercrisg physical fitness connected issues on Yahoo… guess I lost track of what I had been performing! Anyway I’ll be back as soon as once more within the future to check out your blogposts down the road. Thanks!

91.224.161.250: USiMpJTzJAfi

2012-03-15T16:17:54Z

USiMpJTzJAfi

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 15 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Haha, I like~~ your ~~last line! Thanks for your feedback!~~I ~~coepletmly agree but I feel those intricacies are becoming simplicities because of the way the technology has developed and now what the technology can do~~. I ~~use FCE 4 and a lot of the edits are as simple as pressing~~ a ~~button and these programs are so forgiving that if you mess up its command+z~~ and ~~you are back~~ to ~~where you were before the mess up. It almost feels like the process will eventually get dumbed down to the point~~ of ~~click this to do that~~. ~~About the quality and properness you are very right. The edits need to~~ be ~~made properly and followed by the rules of editing. Unless you read a book, take a class or learn second hand from someone who has read a book~~ or ~~taken~~ a ~~class, its not something that can just be guessed. It needs, how you said, the keenness and focus. Hopefully, if the process gets watered down the quality won't reflect.I do have~~ to ~~say, and~~ I ~~don't think I pressed this enough in the blog, the Editor is still in the equation if he is a member of~~ the ~~creation of the story~~ from ~~the start.~~ I ~~just remember hearing about this guy who wanted to~~ make ~~a 45 minute short~~ and ~~he gave his great footage (about an hour and 45 of good shots) to a friend who was masterful in the skills of editing. When the guy got the footage back~~ it ~~looked awful and he didn't like it at all~~. I~~'m positive the edits where right~~ and ~~the quality was superb but the story it was telling was wrong~~. ~~I would be horrified by such a situation!~~		After representation wehasotver of your blogposts I moldiness say i pioneer this particularised one to generally be top nick. I mortal a weblog also and necessary to repost a few shear of your articles on my own diary tract. Should it be alright if I use this as daylong I private reference your web diary or create a incoming linkage to your article I procured the snipping from? If not I make and could not do it without having your tolerance . I hump collection starred this article to cheep and zynga calculate motivated for publication. Anyway revalue it either way!

	~~== hRCfNEezbiBHKxLTRL ==~~

	~~/ do you use several pgulins in your theme?~~ it ~~looks like a conflict because of different pgulins~~!~~Ib4m working with the theme for the last 2 weeks and I have absolutely no problems with it, except the navigation.php~~

91.224.161.250: /* hRCfNEezbiBHKxLTRL */ new section

2012-03-15T15:53:49Z

hRCfNEezbiBHKxLTRL: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 15 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Haha, I like your last line! Thanks for your feedback!I coepletmly agree but I feel those intricacies are becoming simplicities because of the way the technology has developed and now what the technology can do. I use FCE 4 and a lot of the edits are as simple as pressing a button and these programs are so forgiving that if you mess up its command+z and you are back to where you were before the mess up. It almost feels like the process will eventually get dumbed down to the point of click this to do that. About the quality and properness you are very right. The edits need to be made properly and followed by the rules of editing. Unless you read a book, take a class or learn second hand from someone who has read a book or taken a class, its not something that can just be guessed. It needs, how you said, the keenness and focus. Hopefully, if the process gets watered down the quality won't reflect.I do have to say, and I don't think I pressed this enough in the blog, the Editor is still in the equation if he is a member of the creation of the story from the start. I just remember hearing about this guy who wanted to make a 45 minute short and he gave his great footage (about an hour and 45 of good shots) to a friend who was masterful in the skills of editing. When the guy got the footage back it looked awful and he didn't like it at all. I'm positive the edits where right and the quality was superb but the story it was telling was wrong. I would be horrified by such a situation!		Haha, I like your last line! Thanks for your feedback!I coepletmly agree but I feel those intricacies are becoming simplicities because of the way the technology has developed and now what the technology can do. I use FCE 4 and a lot of the edits are as simple as pressing a button and these programs are so forgiving that if you mess up its command+z and you are back to where you were before the mess up. It almost feels like the process will eventually get dumbed down to the point of click this to do that. About the quality and properness you are very right. The edits need to be made properly and followed by the rules of editing. Unless you read a book, take a class or learn second hand from someone who has read a book or taken a class, its not something that can just be guessed. It needs, how you said, the keenness and focus. Hopefully, if the process gets watered down the quality won't reflect.I do have to say, and I don't think I pressed this enough in the blog, the Editor is still in the equation if he is a member of the creation of the story from the start. I just remember hearing about this guy who wanted to make a 45 minute short and he gave his great footage (about an hour and 45 of good shots) to a friend who was masterful in the skills of editing. When the guy got the footage back it looked awful and he didn't like it at all. I'm positive the edits where right and the quality was superb but the story it was telling was wrong. I would be horrified by such a situation!

			== hRCfNEezbiBHKxLTRL ==

			/ do you use several pgulins in your theme? it looks like a conflict because of different pgulins!Ib4m working with the theme for the last 2 weeks and I have absolutely no problems with it, except the navigation.php

46.137.251.95: tnlOtrsZaWc

2012-03-15T07:22:28Z

tnlOtrsZaWc

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 15 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~All~~ of ~~my quesiotns settledthanks~~!		Haha, I like your last line! Thanks for your feedback!I coepletmly agree but I feel those intricacies are becoming simplicities because of the way the technology has developed and now what the technology can do. I use FCE 4 and a lot of the edits are as simple as pressing a button and these programs are so forgiving that if you mess up its command+z and you are back to where you were before the mess up. It almost feels like the process will eventually get dumbed down to the point of click this to do that. About the quality and properness you are very right. The edits need to be made properly and followed by the rules of editing. Unless you read a book, take a class or learn second hand from someone who has read a book or taken a class, its not something that can just be guessed. It needs, how you said, the keenness and focus. Hopefully, if the process gets watered down the quality won't reflect.I do have to say, and I don't think I pressed this enough in the blog, the Editor is still in the equation if he is a member of the creation of the story from the start. I just remember hearing about this guy who wanted to make a 45 minute short and he gave his great footage (about an hour and 45 of good shots) to a friend who was masterful in the skills of editing. When the guy got the footage back it looked awful and he didn't like it at all. I'm positive the edits where right and the quality was superb but the story it was telling was wrong. I would be horrified by such a situation!

109.67.47.195: rjrMWPkzKaWrRqdDTID

2011-06-23T15:39:38Z

rjrMWPkzKaWrRqdDTID

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 23 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Home run! Great slugging with that asnewr~~!		All of my quesiotns settledthanks!

122.248.251.37: QbvbdchupL

2011-06-22T23:59:58Z

QbvbdchupL

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 22 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I am totally wowed and prapered to take the next step now.~~		Home run! Great slugging with that asnewr!

74.119.98.5: pIKnPICv

2011-06-22T11:50:50Z

pIKnPICv

New page

I am totally wowed and prapered to take the next step now.